태터데스크 관리자

도움말
닫기
적용하기   첫페이지 만들기

태터데스크 메시지

저장하였습니다.

포스트 부분 비밀글 만들기 플러그인의 기능


1. 포스트의 특정 부분만을 비밀글로 만들수있습니다(공지사항에서도 가능)
2. 간단한 문답의 인증을 통해서 비밀 부분을 보여줄수있습니다
3. 같은 한 포스트내에서 두개이상의 서로다른 비밀글을 만들수있습니다
     (한포스트에서 답이 같은 비밀글이 여러개일때 하나만 답변해도 모두 동시에 열림)
4. 문답의 인증박스없이 관리자로 로그인했을때만 나타나는 비밀글을 만들수있습니다
    (답변에 root 를 넣으면됩니다 A:root)
5. 관리자 로그인 상태에서는 비밀부분이 전부 공개된 상태로 보여집니다
6. Ajax 스크립트를 이용해서 페이지 이동없이도 비밀글이 공개됩니다
    (비밀부분에 script 포함시 페이지를 Reload 하여 스크립트를 정상적으로 작동시킵니다.)

샘플 테스트


[Secret] 비공개 글입니다. 아래 질문에 대한 답변을 입력해주세요.
Q:함께 가는 것의 의미는 무엇일까요?? (답:uclass)
A:uclass

정답을 잘 입력하셨습니다.

빨리 가려면 혼자 가라
멀리 가려면 함께 가라
빨리 가려면 직선으로 가라
깊이 가려면 굽이 돌아가라
외나무가 되려거든 혼자 서라
푸른 숲이 되려거든 함께 서라

[/Secret]
크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
팀블로그는 하나의 블로그를 여럿이서 함께 글을 올릴 수 있음을 의미합니다.

팀원으로서 내가 글을 올리면
나머지 팀원 개개인에게, 팀블로그에 새로운 글이 올라왔음을
자동으로 이메일로 알려주는 플러그인이 나왔습니다.

이른바 블로그에서도 팀메일이 가능해집니다.

설치 및 사용 방법은 개발자 사이트를 참조하세요~


============================================================================

[실제 사용 예]

사용자 삽입 이미지
메일 제목 : [블로그의 타이틀] + [올린 글 제목]
보낸이 : [블로그의 주인장 이메일]
받는이 : [팀원 개개인] (개개인에게 각자 보내집니다)
메일 내용 : [어느 팀원이 어떤 제목의 글을 언제 올렸는 지]를 알려줍니다.

팀블로그의 파워가 훨씬 커질 것 같습니다.

블로그를 팀메일로 사용할 수 있게 됩니다. ;;//


크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
[알면 ‘짱’ 모르면 ‘왕따’ 되는 IT 트렌드]
웹2.0 시대의 신종 정보 수집법
류현정 전자신문 기자 dreamshot@etnews.co.kr
 

블로그 전성시대다.

그런데 문제는 수많은 블로그와 웹사이트를 일일이 찾아다니다
‘정보의 홍수’ 속에서 허우적댈 수 있다는 점이다.
검색창에 키워드를 넣고 웹사이트를 방문하는 건,
웹1.0 시대의 한물간 정보 수집법!(물론 유효하지만).
그렇다면 정보가 알아서 내게 올 수는 없을까.

웹2.0 시대에는
각 웹사이트와 블로거들이 시시각각으로 올리는 방대한 정보를 확인하는
‘RSS(Really Simple Syndication)’를 써야 한다.
RSS는 인터넷에서 자료 교환과 배급에 관한 규격을 말한다.
각종 인터넷 정보를 자동 구독할 수 있는 수단이다.

차세대 지능형 인터넷 언어(XML)를 기반으로 만들었기 때문에
RSS 주소를 등록만 해놓으면
사이트를 일일이 방문하지 않아도 최신 정보를 자동으로 받아볼 수 있다.

해당 사이트에
‘RSS’나
‘XML’ 혹은
‘구독(Subscriber by RSS)’ 표시가 있다면
RSS 서비스를 지원한다는 이야기다.

먼저 ‘RSS 리더’를 골라야 한다.
RSS 리더는 정보 업데이트 현황을 한눈에 보여주는 정보 구독 장치다.
이 장치에 적응하려면 시간이 좀 걸리지만, 인내심을 내어 도전하면 그리 어렵지 않다.
한글 RSS 리더로는 ‘한RSS’ ‘퍼니 익스프레스’ ‘연모’ 등이 있다.
그 다음 자주 가는 웹사이트나 블로그의 RSS 서비스 주소를 복사하고
이 주소를 내 RSS 리더에 추가하면 끝난다.
이제 RSS 리더에 들어가면 어떤 글이 올라왔는지 일목요연하게 알 수 있다.
이 중에서 흥미로운 것만 골라 읽으면 주요 정보를 놓치지 않는다.

가령 경제와 IT 동향을 파악하기 위해 매일 동아일보와 전자신문을 보기 원한다고 가정해보자.
RSS 리더에
동아일보 경제면 RSS 주소(http://rss.donga.com/economy.xml)와
전자신문 인터넷 모바일 RSS 주소(http://www.ebuzz.co.kr/rss/onepage_mobile.xml)를
등록한다.

주식 투자에 관심이 많고
특히 삼성전자의 주가 관련 정보가 궁금하다면
포털 뉴스 검색창에 ‘삼성전자 주가’를 친 후 이 결과에 대한 RSS 주소를 복사해두자.
이후로는 포털 검색 과정 없이 삼성전자 주가와 관련한 뉴스는
내 RSS 리더로 속속 들어올 것이다.

각종 블로그를 읽는 방법도 마찬가지다.
영화, 요리 등 10개도 넘는 블로그를 오가는 당신이 할 일은
블로그 RSS 주소를 내 RSS 리더에 복사하는 일이다.

RSS는 지능화한 웹, 진화한 웹의 한 형태다.
누구든지 자유롭게 기술하고 정보를 교환하는
웹2.0 시대에 맞게
웹은 더 똑똑해져 세상을 바꿔 나가고 있다.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

유클래스(Uclass) 사이트는 블로그입니다.
당연히 RSS를 지원합니다.
오른쪽 하단에 있습니다..      진너자하
크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
‘How’가 지배하는 블로그 시대

                                                                                                 동아일보 2007-06-28
3년 전 미국 보스턴 로건 공항에서 비행기를 기다릴 때의 일이다.
기내에서 읽을 잡지를 고른 뒤 계산대로 가자
다른 방향에서 다가온 한 여인이 바로 내 뒤에 섰다.
적어도 내 생각에는 그랬다.
그러나 돈을 내려고 하자 이 여인이 소리를 쳤다.
“실례합니다. 제가 먼저 왔거든요!”
그러곤 나를 쏘아보더니 “당신이 누군지 알아요”라고 말했다.
그 소리를 듣곤 내가 분명히 먼저 왔음에도 불구하고 미안하다고 말했다.

이 일이 오늘 일어난다면 어떨까.
나는 아마도 이렇게 말할지 모른다.
“아가씨, 미안합니다. 제가 잘못했습니다. 먼저 계산하세요.
(죄송하다는 뜻으로) 당신의 잡지를 제가 사 드려도 될까요?
아니면 점심이라도?”

왜냐고?
이 여성이 블로그를 하거나 휴대전화의 카메라를 내게 들이댈지 모르기 때문이다.
만약 그렇다면
‘나의 무례함’을 전 세계에,
철저히 그녀의 관점에서 전하며
내가 무례하고 거만하며 아무 줄에나 끼어들어도 된다고 생각하는 사람이라고
몰아붙일지도 모른다.
거 참!
 

누구나 블로그를 가진 요즘엔 모두가 출판업자인 셈이다.

누구나 카메라가 부착된 휴대전화를 갖고 있으니 모두가 파파라치인 셈이다.
유튜브 동영상은 모두를 영화제작자로 만들었다.
그렇다면
이들이 촬영하고 쓰는 대상은 누구나 공인(公人)이 된다는 얘기다.
블로그의 확산은 세상의 토론거리를 좀 더 풍부하고 투명하게 만들었다.

기업윤리회사인 LRN의 설립자이며 최고경영자인 도브 사이드먼 Dov Seidman 씨는
새로운 책
 

‘어떻게(How)’
에서


누구나 별다른 편집 절차를 거치지 않고 의견을 올리는 세상에서
승리자가 되려면
상황 변화를 잘 활용해야 한다고 강조했다.

당신이 말하는 것이나 쓰는 것들은 ‘디지털 지문’으로 남아 결코 지워지지 않는다.

우리 세대 땐 얼빠진 행동을 해도 이력서에 포함되지 않지만 지금은 온라인에 남는다.
고용주들이 입사지원자의 이력서를 읽기도 전에
이미 구글로 사전조사를 마칠 수 있다는 얘기다.

“전자적 형태의 기억이 지속된다는 것은 제2의 기회를 더 어렵게 만든다.”
사이드먼 씨의 얘기다.
그는
“정보화 시대에선 삶의 다른 장(章)을 펼치거나 뒤에 숨기 어렵다”며
당신의 과거는 당신의 현재”라고 강조했다.
삶을 더 낫게 만들기 위해선 ‘어떻게’가 관건이 된다는 것이 그의 주장이다.
사업에서도 이런 상황은 마찬가지다.

이런 변화는 새로운 기회도 만들어 낸다.
오늘날에는 당신이 만든 ‘무엇’이 실시간으로 복제되고 다른 사람에게 팔리고 있다.
이런 시대에선

당신이 어떻게 고객을 대하고,
어떻게 약속을 지키고,
어떻게 협력하느냐에 따라 차별화를 끌어낼 수 있다.

사이드먼 씨가 소개한 사례는 다음과 같다.

미시간의 한 병원에서는
실수한 의사들이 환자들에게 사과하도록 교육한 뒤
의료사고 소송이 극적으로 줄어들었다.

텍사스의 한 대형 자동차 판매점은
정비사들에게 차량 수리에 드는 회사 비용을 얼마든지 자유롭게 쓰도록 한 뒤
오히려 비용이 줄어들고 고객의 만족도가 높아진 것을 확인했다.

뉴욕의 도넛 가게에서는
고객이 스스로 잔돈을 알아서 내도록 한 뒤
더 빨리 더 많은 사람에게 도넛을 팔 수 있었고,
이 고객들을 단골로 만들 수 있었다.

당신이 자동차를 팔든지 신문을 팔든지 ‘어떻게’ 하느냐가 중요하다는 얘기다.

이젠 더 많은 사람이 당신이 제대로 하는지 안 하는지를 알게 된 시대인 것이다.

토머스 프리드먼 뉴욕타임스 칼럼니스트

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A conversation between Thomas Friedman, Pulitzer-prize winning author of The World is Flat and Dov Seidman, author of HOW: Why HOW We Do Anything Means Everything…in Business (and in Life)

National Press Club
June 18, 2007

Tom Friedman: Thanks to the Press Club for having us here. Dov, it’s good to see you but this evening is all about me. So…

Dov Seidman: I can help with that.

Tom Friedman: Because whenever Dov and I are together, it’s always about me. It’s what column idea is Dov going to give me next because Dov and I never, ever get together without him stimulating a column idea or, in the case of The World is Flat, a couple of good chapter sections. So I’m not here because Dov quoted me or because I quoted him, I’m here because I quoted him in my book because he’s been a great teacher of mine and a really innovative thinker.

I’ve been looking forward to this evening. I’ve got my notebook and if I don’t get at least one or two columns out of this, you owe me big time. So, let’s go right at it Dov. The book is called HOW. And right off, in the first chapter, you make a very bold statement. You say “It’s not about what you do. That was when the world was round. It’s about how you do it.” What happened, why that shift from what to how?

Dov Seidman: I’m going to answer the question but let me just take a moment to say I, too, am thrilled to be here, and since I have the last word, I’m going to say I learn more from you.

Tom Friedman: No problem.

Dov Seidman: So, you know, you write about entering the 21st century. But to enter the 21st century, we exited the just-do-it century, where teachers and bosses told us just get it done. How doesn’t matter. You couldn’t look into how people got things done. It was just do it, just get it done, don’t break the law. There were no boundaries ? what we can and can’t do. Just get it done. And that’s as much instruction as many employees at big companies got: just get it done. And it was about speed, efficiency, productivity, out-performing, out-producing the competition. What we made, what we do, what service we provide was the key to getting ahead.

Tom Friedman: Jerry Maguire.
Dov Seidman: Well, in the movie, Jerry Maguire got fired after he wrote that memo. But he had it right. The things we think and do not say. But he said what should have been said and what people are now hearing.
 
Now, those things still matter today but today they keep us in the game. Years ago we would win the game by building a better, faster, cheaper mouse trap. But today the stuff ? the “whats” we make ? are reverse-engineered not in six months but overnight. They’re copied and we get an advantage, but it’s short-lived.

But how we do what we do is so vast and so varied, how the rich tapestry of how human beings behave and conduct themselves and connect and collaborate in this flat world is so ripe with variation. And when there’s great variation, there’s opportunity for differentiation.

But let me just illustrate what I mean by how. Any of us today can go to a mall, and buy a new cell phone, a new gadget, a new plasma TV screen. And you walk into a retail outlet and you know you can get that product at the same price across the street and in the next mall or online. And the sales clerk says to you, “Over there, aisle 42, help yourself.” I don’t think that’s  going to cut it. Or what if that person is instructed by their boss any time someone gets within 10 feet of you to smile and take a walk? Anybody can take a walk. How is about what happens during the walk? Is there a connection? Is it an authentic open conversation?

Can you say, “You know, here’s why you shouldn’t get the most expensive one. Here’s what’s good about the product you asked for but here’s what it’s missing.” And if I make my purchasing decision based on that connection, then that person out-behaved the competition; they didn’t just out-perform them because the product is the same there or anyplace else.

That’s what I mean by how. This unique opportunity to differentiate, to build lasting success by how we do what we do or how we behave, out-behave the competition.

Tom Friedman: Let me ask how we got to that world, though? More examples of companies you’ve encountered who got it. You met with the CEO and he said, “Oh, I get that,” and then made a change that people here could really understand what you’re talking about. Give me a couple of concrete examples.

Dov Seidman: Before I talk about companies, I need to say that all companies are communities and teams. They’re people. Many of them are incorporated in Delaware, and we don’t go to Delaware. I mean companies are people. The companies that get it are the ones who are fostering atmospheres, cultures where people feel safe and secure, and they trust that they can reach out and innovate in how they do things and not just in what they do.

I talk in the book about GE Durham. They make engines with 10,000 parts. These engines keep Air Force One in the air, and we fly our kids to see their grandparents on Thanksgiving on these things. There’s only one directive at this plant in North Carolina in Durham: what date the engine needs to be sent off by.

The organization is flat. There’s one boss and his job is to get people talking. Every decision is made by engineers, and they shipped 400 engines last year. Zero material defects; 15 percent of them had at most one cosmetic defect.

 They out-performed the competition by how they work together. A complete trust-based system, no commissary, no rules, no Post-it on the wall that says “Don’t put your feet on the table and don’t write on the chair.” So people can then write on the tables and put their feet on the chairs. It’s “we trust each other to focus on that mission.” So that’s one example.

One more. The University of Michigan Health System. They were getting sued in the last few years for malpractice. And before the world was flat, people hunkered down. They admitted nothing. They fought these things. And that was their strategy.
And then they said let’s get back in touch with that patient-doctor relationship. It’s sacred. Let’s lean into it and go on offense, and why don’t we apologize in a real way?

Lawsuits and payouts went down by 50 percent because they connected with their patients through an apology. And their patients understood that their doctors aren’t just human doings, they’re human beings. Real people. We’re fallible and if you act like one and apologize and take responsibility, I’ll stick with you. They got it. And I can go on but there’s more to cover.

Tom Friedman: Did Barack Obama just get a good how right when he apologized today for his campaign leaking a derogatory memo about Hillary Clinton? Is that a good how example?

 Dov Seidman: Yes. First he said I made, we made, a mistake. Not I, we made a mistake. And then he emphasized how we communicate on this campaign is key, and we got it wrong this time. And we’ll endeavor not to do it again.

Tom Friedman: What happened in the world that made this shift to how so prominent? What is it that made us? Behind how is really a whole set of technologies which make us all so transparent, which make our hows ? when we get them right and wrong ? so much clearer to ourselves and to others. What happened?

Dov Seidman: Well, simply put, we’ve been connected. We live in a hyper-connected world. In fact, we’ve been connected up faster than we as human beings have found frameworks and languages to understand each other. We are asked to collaborate with people, and some of them think that a cow is a sacred object and other people think it’s lunch later on today. And we don’t speak common languages and yet we are part of global supply chains.

Now in a connected world, those who make powerful connections are the ones getting ahead. Those who can relate to others who can extend, who can build trust in the relationship with suppliers and colleagues while making powerful connections is about how we relate and collaborate with others. That’s about how we do what we do, not about what we do. So simply put, in a connected world, those who make connections win. Making connections is all about how we do what we do.

Tom Friedman: But there’s something prior to that. There’s a level of transparency now. Where did that, where does that fit into all of this?

Dov Seidman: Well we’re transparent because we’re connected. Now we used to think that information is key because we can control it. Companies fall in love with Joe Camel, the Marlboro man, Ronald McDonald. We don’t need to tell you about hydrogen peroxide; blondes have more fun. That’s why you should dye your hair. Today, what’s in those chemicals? Because we can look through. And this is a message for our kids. So we think we can control the message, but information today is like a toddler. It goes everywhere, it gets into everything it can’t be controlled. And the point to keep in mind is we all crafted that perfect resume. We could control our life story.

Tom Friedman: Let’s stop there. Let’s just stop for one second because I want to set up that point because when I got out of college, when you got out of college, applied for my first job, I write up a resume. I got to write my own resume, got to tell my own story. It was all true. But I got to write it, emphasized certain things, de-emphasized others. How about today? Somebody comes to apply to you for a job, what’s new today?

Dov Seidman: You can write your resume but it’ll be pushed aside. People will blow right past it because before I read your resume because it was the most efficient thing I could do. How else could I find out information about you?

Today, I can more efficiently Google you, go onto My Space and see what you write about yourself, what your friends say about you. Forget about saying that’s a semester that the dog ate my homework. If you were out partying, another friend is saying didn’t we have fun that semester. So your resume is being written about you.

So how do we turn these conditions to our advantage? We have to understand that if our resume is being written about us, we don’t get to tell our story, it’s being told. Our story today is how we live our lives. That’s our resume, how we live our lives; how we make decisions; how we say what we mean; how we mean what we say; how we follow through; when we don’t, how we apologize; how we treat others.

Tom Friedman: Because in a world where everyone has a cell phone with a camera, everyone’s a paparazzi. In a world where everyone has a blog, everyone’s a reporter. And in a world where everyone has access to You Tube, everyone’s a filmmaker. Now when everyone’s a paparazzi, a reporter and a filmmaker, everyone else is a public figure, leaving digital footprints everywhere. That’s really what you’re saying. Therefore, your hows are going to be etched in stone from a very early age.

Dov Seidman: I talk about persistence of memory. In many ways, what’s old is new again. But what’s old matters more today than it ever did. Many years ago, people found themselves in small towns. They understood the currency of their reputation. Anything they did stayed within the town forever. If a few town elders died off, maybe they took some secrets with them but, for the most part, we understood that the most previous possession we have is our reputation.

Tom Friedman: What happened in Peoria stayed in Peoria.

Dov Seidman: Then the world became disconnected. We could re-invest ourselves. Doctors can move; quack doctors can move to the next town. And we stopped earning our reputation because we focused on what we did, efficiency, bottom line, speed, etc. In a connected world, we’re back to that small town and this time nothing gets erased. It actually stays forever. So in many ways, what’s old is new but doubly so.

Tom Friedman: So George W. Bush could never have been elected President had he gone through Yale the last four years because there would be so many cell phone pictures of him in different people’s face books. You can’t be young and crazy any more and expect to be elected President. You’re leaving footprints everywhere. What advice do you have then for young people?

Dov Seidman: The first thing I’d say is forget about managing your reputation. You’re in a baseball game of life. You’re up at the plate early on, and every pitch counts and you gotta connect. And you have to accumulate a lifetime batting average. You’re up at the plate.

And you have to earn your reputation, one interaction, one communication, one treatment of a friend and a colleague at a time. And if you do that, you’re going to have a currency that will arrive before you do and allow you to get ahead.

People will not keep you at arm’s length. They’ll invite you on to teams. They’ll collaborate with you. They’ll share credit with you, and I would tell young people with deference, because remember young people are connected better than we are.

They understand this world better than we do. The one thing they get is how to connect. They are more amazing, and they connect in more fascinating ways that we don’t think of. But the one thing that we do need to remind them, even though they have a leg up on us in terms of how to innovate in their connections, we have to tell them what matters and how this, how they do it is what’s  going to make the difference. And I think that’s the advice I would lean into with young people.

Tom Friedman: I feel that in my own life, how much more transparent…

Dov Seidman: If you cut someone off in line that will be on You Tube not what you write about. If you’re in the store and you cut someone off, that Tom Friedman guy cut me off in the store.

Tom Friedman: Well I actually had that experience. I was teaching up in Boston at Harvard about 5, 6 years ago, and I was at Logan Airport after class, and I was going to buy a magazine. And I was walking to the magazine stand, and the woman was coming from here, and I thought I got there first. I put down my money and she said, “Excuse me, I was here first.” And she was looking at me Dov, “I know who you are.”
Had that happened today, I’d say ma’am could I buy your magazines, could I shine your shoes, could I take you to lunch? So, you know, I think anyone…

Dov Seidman: And people are getting this. There’s one person in the book that gets the secret better than anybody else. The guy sells doughnuts in the streets of Manhattan and we all know that there are all these doughnut stands. And he sells a great fresh doughnut, but so does the guy he’s competing with across the way.

So what did he do? He put a change box, and people put down a dollar, and they ask for a doughnut and they get to take their own change. His business sped up threefold because he didn’t sit there counting change. People had a better experience because they took their doughnut and hit the road. But they felt this feeling that he trusts them. And when he extended trust to them, they repaid the trust by coming back the next day. And his business just propelled itself because of a how. How he connected with his customers. He innovated in how. He said let me show you how I can use change to tell you I trust you.

Tom Friedman: We’re just coming off the U.S. Open. You spoke to the golfer, David Toms. What did you learn from him about how?

Dov Seidman: That how matters when no one is looking. That life ? back to baseball and keeping your head in the game every time ? Toms understands something that many people don’t know, that in a transparent world, people will see how consistent you are. And his ability to stay and golf is about how you bring yourself to the ball, mentally, spiritually.

 He understands that whenever he doesn’t get his hows right, he creates dissonance and friction in his mind. And he felt that he’s trying to do something long term. He wants his reputation to be earned over a lifetime. He wants to do something of significance. And he understood how damaging it is to him to get his hows wrong in that sense. And even when the official said you don’t need to disqualify yourself, he disqualified himself from the British Open a few years back. He chose to do so because he saw his life as part of that string, and I’m mixing metaphors, of at bats.

Tom Friedman: So, what would you tell a high school principal today? Let’s bring how to education. We know what can go wrong. You can leave digital footprints. But how do you build in young people the positive attributes to thrive the way you’ve talked about, before they would get to college or the marketplace?

Dov Seidman: Education became part of the “just do it” world. I think we started to look to schools, high schools and universities to produce economic engines, engines of commerce, people who will show up at companies who have skills because we felt that collaboration was taking diverse skills and just putting them in a room together. And those skills, knowledge, that’s being outsourced. We might have a specialization that’ll give us an edge for just six months.

I would tell educators that we’re back to liberal arts education: how we understand other people, the human condition, how we show compassion, how we extend sympathies to others, how we get along.

I actually think that the liberal arts are  going to have a renaissance that instead of producing human doings, we’re  going to have to produce human beings who connect and relate to others better.

Tom Friedman: Human doers: no. Human beings: yes.
Dov Seidman: Yes.

Tom Friedman: Why does liberal arts matter in producing human beings as opposed to human doers?

Dov Seidman: Liberal arts education was about character development. And the philosopher Heraclytus said that character is your destiny. And liberal arts understands that people who get the human condition, who through literature understand pain and suffering, who through philosophy understand moral and ethical issues, through political theory understand how societies work. These are the people who can connect and relate to others in a world that we’re so connected.

Tom Friedman: How do you deal with the CEO? You get invited, I know, into a lot of companies, including the New York Times. Let’s do a little play acting here. “Okay Seidman, I’ve got 15 minutes. I’ve heard your rap about LRN. Why do I need to hire your company, read your book to teach me about how? We hit our numbers this quarter.”

Dov Seidman: I think that…
Tom Friedman: What is this stuff?
Dov Seidman: This stuff. Well it’s not stuff, it’s how.
Tom Friedman: Make a sale.

Dov Seidman: Make a sale. Look, what do CEO’s want to do? They preside over stadiums. That’s why I talk about the wave as the most powerful metaphor.

Tom Friedman: What do you mean by that, the wave is … the most powerful metaphor?

Dov Seidman: I open the book with the wave. You know, we’ve all been in stadiums where we do the wave. Anybody feel like doing one? You do a wave. And to me it’s the most powerful metaphor for business. I actually interviewed Crazy George, [instigator of the first wave], and I asked him, “Did you threaten to punch someone if they didn’t stand up the first time you wanted a wave?” Well, the person halfway across the stadium felt safe. “Did you show up with a bunch of $20 bills and says ‘here’s 20, will you get up?’ Did you motivate people with a twenty?” No, he didn’t have enough twenties to go around.
“Were you non-transparent? Did you say please stand up but it’s a secret, I won’t tell you why?” No. “How did you get the wave to go?” He shared his vision.

Everything about the wave you could break down into all the hows you have to get right. Now CEO’s understand that whatever they’re trying to accomplish in this connected world has to be done with and through people. And there are only three ways to get a human being to do something. Three ways. You can coerce, you can motivate or you can inspire.

Now, none of us like to be coerced. “Get this report to me by 4:00.” That’s coercion. The only reason to get it to you by 4:00 is your title is bigger than mine, and you’re intimating that something bad might happen to me if I don’t. Motivation became kind of the name of the game in the 80’s and 90’s. Here are playing by the rules. If you play by the rules and do what we tell you, here’s a bonus, here’s a good salary, a promotion, a little extra in your 401K plan. But we understand that people like pleasure and hate pain so we use carrots and sticks to motivate them. Interestingly, motivation’s very expensive and doesn’t create deep bonds. I’ll keep at this job to the extent I’m motivated.

Tom Friedman:  Yeah, you might have brought in Vince Lombardi-like motivational speakers to speak to your workforce.

Dov Seidman: Right. But today it’s about inspiration. And inspiration’s free because it comes from within. So I would tell CEO’s today, “How do you create an environment where people are inspired, that something is called forth and then it’s the best of who they are, that they bring passion?” Because you cannot motivate someone to delight a customer. To follow these rules, to obey a rule is to do exactly what it tells you. You could have 100 percent compliance with everything that motivates someone and delight nobody and exceed no expectations. Yet CEO’s want people to do more and make these powerful connections on behalf of the company. It’s all about inspiration.

Tom Friedman: Okay Seidman. Inspiration. I offer my company. How do I do that? I have to hire you to do that or is that my job?

Dov Seidman: Well it’s your job to inspire but the key is about the wave. You could be drunk on four beers and start a wave. You don’t need to be the CEO in the crowd.

You know, companies are dismantling their centers for innovation because they want the entire company to innovate. They want to create cultures that are innovative.

Now, you could hire our company to give you approaches and methodologies to educate people on how they do whatever it is they do. How they speak to officials of foreign governments. How they write appropriate and respectful and careful emails. But in the end you have to commit to use those things that inspire and don’t just motivate and coerce.

Now, the secret to inspiration is that people act on their beliefs. And beliefs are the only things that people can share. People can’t share carrots. They can’t share coercion. But if you can get people to share in a sense of mission and purpose and beliefs, you can get these waves to happen.

And that’s why we’re seeing a move away ? and I write about this from just telling people what they can and can’t do ? into getting them to think in terms of what they should and should not do. Here are the values we believe. Because only values can propel and guide us.
 
 When you think of a rule, that is, you go bowling like we do with kids and you put the guardrails up. The rules allow you to not throw the ball in the gutter, but there’s nothing in a rule that can help you hit a strike in life or in business. Values propel and guide us. And CEO’s understand that if they can enlist their people in a set of values that they share, they’re  going to start to act in inspired ways.

Tom Friedman: So I want to go back. Which are the best how companies that you’ve seen? Which companies really get it, whether it’s a retail company, a restaurant chain, a hotel, a manufacturer, who really gets it?

Dov Seidman: There are people in every company that I work with that are getting it. I write about Angel Zamora. This happened to me. He works for UPS. Now you write about UPS opening up and collaborating with Toshiba, truly to take over Toshiba’s back end. A lot of trust. Someone got their hows right. Think of the trust that had to have happened there.

 But let me tell you something else UPS does. I tried to order some jewelry for my anniversary, and the day before you don’t want to not get an anniversary gift. You met my wife. And it was 12:00 and he showed up without the package, and it was over. And I said Angel, I really need this. And he said it’s not on my cart. That guy went to downtown Los Angeles from the West Side, found it and brought it back. Now he could have said to me, “Look, my shift is over at 12:00. What I do is deliver packages until my shift is over.” Instead, he understood that he’s an agent that keeps promises on behalf of his company.

Tom Friedman: An agent who keeps promises on behalf of his company.
Dov Seidman: Absolutely.
Tom Friedman: That’s an interesting job description.

Dov Seidman: He is a promise keeper. He did extra. He gave me his boss Eric’s cell phone, and they delivered that package.
What is it that allows a Southwest Airlines pilot to take a baby stroller downstairs and help check in a flight? I see pilots in other airlines just sit there and watch one person check in an entire flight, and they turn their planes around in 28 minutes and Southwest does it in almost half the time.

What is it? There’s no rule, no carrot and stick, no extra pay to help check in a flight. But there’s something about the value of giving people a no frills, happy experience but getting them home on time and safely that they’ve bought into. And they’re acting on that.
And there are many companies who are getting this. But what all companies are getting is that they need to devote newfound energy. They are running out of areas to differentiate. In the end, business is about creating value that can’t be copied by the competition.

Tom Friedman: Because everything gets commoditized.

Dov Seidman: Everything gets commoditized. How we do what we do is unique. It’s like one family saying I’d like to be like the Friedman family. Can someone copy your family? How can one culture copy another? Their history? So, how we do what we do is an area so ripe to create lasting differentiated advantage because it can’t be copied.

Mossimo Ferragamo talks about his father making these perfect shoes, and they had the best shoe. And today he will be the first to tell you that up and down Fifth Avenue in New York people sell shoes just as good.

And he talks about the person he admires the most in his company is a young person who works in corporate and on a Saturday on vacation she took a walk down Fifth Avenue and saw that the Ferragamo store was bustling. It was hectic. There were too many people in there, and she walked in and volunteered. And helped people and was there all day on her vacation.

One person didn’t know what he was doing; he was getting gifts for his family. She took out a list, they made a list, and I think that she made a customer for life. You know what Mossimo told me? “What I need to do as CEO of Ferragamo ? (and they’re about to go public and you’ll see even more into that business) ? is I have to create an atmosphere where that happens day in, day out. If I do that, I win. It’s not just about my father’s craft. That’s where we are today.”

Tom Friedman: Dov, you say something I think at the end of the book about how this only goes one way. We’re only getting to get more transparent, more connected, more wired. Do you see that, and how will that affect how? Could we get a difference of degree that also becomes a difference in kind? Can there be another stage to this?

Dov Seidman: Well, I agree that we are never going to be any less exposed or connected than we are today. There are still too many people who are hunkering down, trying to avoid exposure. The winners are going to lean in, they’re going to go from defense to offense. And they will say there’s an opportunity here to turn this to my advantage.

Tom Friedman: Give me an example of that.

Dov Seidman: Well, the doughnut guy, the Methodist Hospital. People who say what’s wrong with saying you’re sorry? I mean look what happened with the BP CEO, a venerated great career. He only ran into trouble ? people really didn’t care what he did outside of work ? when he tried to suppress information. When he tried to control his story.

Look at Kellogg’s just today. In 1997 Kellogg’s decided to re-invigorate the company. This was just recently reported, by saying, you know, every kid has to start the day with a great breakfast. And they started talking about Fruit Loops again. Great campaigns. And you know what they did? They, just last week, they came out and said we are only going to advertise to children if the cereal meets nutritional guidelines. And we can no longer say that about Fruit Loops. So 1997 they tried to brand themselves. 2007, we make a promise.

And the CEO of McDonalds talks about the moment of truth, that 30- second drive through the drive-through at McDonalds. Years ago, McDonalds controlled its story. What did it say? Billions of people served. Think greatly of us. Look at how many people we’re serving.

 Now, tell me about trans-fats. Tell me about what are you doing about obesity? When you can look into somebody in a connected world people want a connection. And the just-do-it society was very individualistic.

Today, you have to be other regarding. And if companies don’t make themselves about the person they’re serving and making and keeping promises to them. And that’s why I interviewed William Broyles, [who wrote] the movie Castaway. And many of you ? have you seen the movie Castaway? Right, remember Tom Hanks? Do you think this movie was about survival for the most part, survival? Remember at the end of the movie he delivered the package? And what did he write on it? This package gave me meaning.

In the book I write about people who lay bricks for a living, and you walk up to them and [they] say, “Can’t you see I’m laying bricks?” And the other person says, “I’m building a cathedral.”

So Tom Hanks is building a cathedral. He understands that FedEx keeps a promise, and he’s there as an instrument to keep them.
When people see themselves in larger terms ? I’m building a cathedral ? two things happen. One is if this cathedral is so large, there’s room to invite others in. The bricklayer has no room to collaborate with someone. It’s one brick on a time. But when people see their endeavors in larger terms, they create space to invite others in. But also to build the cathedral, you need to think about how you’re going to do it and how you’re going to inspire others. And the greatest companies are the one getting their people to think in larger terms.

Tom Friedman: But that says to me so are the greatest countries. And that’s a question of leadership. I’m not going to ask you who I should vote for. But I will or there’s someone in the front row who has an idea. But I will ask you this. I was actually having this conversation with Tim Shriver from Special Olympics the other day.

Everyone talks about experience. We need someone who’s experienced. Well, one thing we’ve learned from the last administration that experience as Gerald Ford’s chief of staff might not be the most relevant experience. My question really is Tim’s question. Experience, for what? What kind of experience? In a how world, what should we be looking for in the different candidates? What questions should we be asking? What traits should we be looking for that, in an age of how, we would want in our country’s CEO, in our country’s architect?

Dov Seidman: I think you hint at the answer yourself at the end of your last edition. You call for imagination. HOW is about how nations relate to each other, how people, how organizations profit and not ? and that’s another way of asking where is imagination and innovation going to come from to problems that are so complex, from health care, whatever people care about. I think one thing we agree on is that these problems have become very large. And we’re going to need imagination. And I say you can’t do imagination. You can only get it.

Tom Friedman: What does that mean?

Dov Seidman: Well, why don’t people innovate? Because they’re scared to innovate to do something new. Someone has to take a risk that their boss won’t think they’re stupid, that they won’t get fired, that if they make a mistake and squander some funds, it was worth trying.

So we ask for innovation and imagination but people do what they did yesterday. Leaders today are  going to create atmospheres where there is so much trust, and that’s the one thing that this country can produce better than any country.

I believe that we are designed to manufacture trust. In high trust environments people start to take risk. And when they take risk, they innovate. And when they innovate, they create progress. And the only acronym in this book is TRIP. That Trust leads to Risk taking which leads to Innovation or Imagination which leads to Progress. Which is what we want. We want to make progress on our most vexing and largest problems.

And the leaders that I don’t care for are the ones that think that trust is: can I trust this guy, can we work with that person? They think trust is something out there and we go looking for it. And we check up on people.

The leaders who get it understand that trust is a verb. It’s an action. You trust. And when you trust someone, if I trust you Tom, I’m giving you the power to do right by me or let me down. I’m the one taking a risk. And leaders are the ones who can get the trust cycle going.

So now ask me the 64 trillion dollar question. Well who do we trust? We trust people who have integrity, who get their hows right, who are honest, who are honorable. Because that’s who we are prepared to go with.

Tom Friedman: But does that also then speak, Dov, that we need a leader who’s truly a uniter not a divider, one who builds trust who erases red states and green states and all that nonsense.

Dov Seidman: Back to the wave. You know what’s amazing about the wave? You can show up to root for the other team and you stand up with those guys. Think of that. The wave is not just for season ticket holders. You could buy a ticket for this game, you could show up for the other team. But if you can lay out a vision as to how an unbroken wave of human energy can help your team win or solve this problem or advance the cause, you can pull in people who came to root for the other team. And leaders have to unite.
 
They have to take advantage of the fact that we’re in a connected world. And a 30-second spot in this election is not  going to do it because that’s like the resume. We’re  going to blow past that and see who can have a one-to-one authentic two-way conversation with people. Even J.W. Marriott ? guy turned 75 years old, right ? and the first 74 years of his life he ran around Marriott properties with a pencil and a pad of paper taking notes. Now he’s blogging and on his first blog he said I promise you to get no help from corporate communications and PR. I’m not  going to spin and message this. I’m going to open up, even though I’m 75 and have a conversation. That’s a leader of a large organization that gets it. I think politicians are no different.

Tom Friedman: Let me translate this to foreign policy. There are a couple of areas I want to ask about. Is Iraq a low-trust country? Is that the problem? I’m asking you very seriously. As you look at a country like Iraq, Gaza, what’s going on there. Do you see low-trust countries?

Dov Seidman: So, yes and let me tell you why. I actually talk about something called the certainty gap. And I think the key to understanding a flat world is the certainty gap. I mean every human being has an image in his or her mind of a totally predictable certain world. That if I invest my currency here, it’s not going to be stolen. What will happen if I create intellectual property? I’ll be able to safeguard it. And we have this perfect image of certainty. And when things are certain, we pursue our lives. We run forward, we run forward. When the gap is small, you see a lot of risk taking and innovation.

When the certainty gap is big, people get paralyzed and they stand on their feet and they start to act out in ways that are destructive. I think the certainly gap is massive in Iraq. Now, we tended to try to close certainty gaps in the past: rules, regimes and we tell people what they can and can’t do because the nature of law is such as it’s designed to give people certainty.

Now, rules do tend to work. I’ve been living in California. I’m glad that there are some rules about earthquake-proof buildings. But rules are quite limited in terms of inspiring the best in human conduct. And the only way to close the certainty gap is to not legislate how people should behave, but to create trust. And trust fills the certainty gap, and I think that when in environments in countries where there are massive gaps of uncertainty, I typically find those to be low trust environments for nations, etc.

Tom Friedman: If you were doing a world map of countries and cultures, are there cultures where HOW is intuitively and easily absorbed and others where it’s more resistant?

Dov Seidman: I think that we’re at a plateau. I write about Transparency International and Francis Fukuyama. There are a lot of studies about how to trust nations. And that yes, high-trust nations have more innovation because people feel secure.

But I actually think that we became so obsessed in the 80’s and 90’s with efficiency and the bottom line that we hit a plateau, and we use rules for too many things. Most companies ? from Sarbanes-Oxley to what happens inside companies ? we tend to try to manufacture this certainty that trust is there to give through rules. And I think we’ve become over-regulated and we’re starting to get in the way.

 Companies don’t have rules that say don’t forget to breathe. Employees naturally breathe so we don’t legislate breathing. Wherever there’s a rule, something went wrong and somebody in power was upset and said I don’t want this to happen again, and they put a rule.

And next year we’re going to have an election that says that if you need to be 18 to vote, and if I can prove that I’m 18, I get to vote. But there are some 25-year-old immature people voting and some 15-year- old highly mature people with a sense of civic duty not voting. Eighteen is a proxy. It’s a great rule if you want to administer a nationwide election in one day. But it doesn’t get you focused on what we should be focused on: ideas, solutions, civic responsibility. And we became so obsessed with efficiency that I think that countries are going to get back to being about values. And those are going to run ahead faster. Values propel.

Tom Friedman: We’re at the National Press Club. Is the press getting its hows right or wrong in your gross generalization?

Dov Seidman: I hope I was, I wish I was. At this point I was wishing I was out of time. But…
Tom Friedman: It’s always the last question.
Dov Seidman: It’s always the last question. But I…
Tom Friedman: No seriously…

Dov Seidman: To the extent that, just intuitively, to the extent the press thinks that their job is to be a watchdog, we can do anything we want because we’re here to watch you and that’s our role in society, to be a watchdog. I think that they’re embracing the wrong paradigm.

I think the press is there to be about truth, and there to take advantage of how connected the world is to put things out there in an objective, independent, informative, valuable way.

If they’re doing anything other than that, I think that the conditions that they find themselves are going to bring them down. And we’ve seen some of that within the New York Times and others. The measure of life today is consistency. Simply put, it’s consistency. That’s true. This election we’re  going to be able to see how consistent every candidate has been or how they explain inconsistency. The press, politics, leaders have to be consistent. Back to that baseball.

Tom Friedman: You have to be consistent or you better be able to explain your…
Dov Seidman: Inconsistencies.
Tom Friedman: …your deviations in a credible way that connects with people.

Dov Seidman: I believe that Joe Biden just did that. Look, in 1987 he had the issue with Neil Kinnock and the Labor Party in England and what did he say recently? “I wasn’t ready to be president in 1987. I wasn’t mature enough. But here’s what I’ve learned. Here’s why that doesn’t fully speak to how honorable I am.”

And he actually recently said “I think I’m honorable enough to be president but it took me another 20 years to become that person.”
I don’t know what’s going to happen but I know that he’s leaning in, and he says today when he’s not sure of an answer, he says “I think I’ve got this right. And if I don’t, forgive me but here’s the point I’m trying to make.” He understands how to turn the conditions to his advantage.

Tom Friedman: Before we go to the question or to the floor though, I have one big question. Will HOW be translated into Chinese?

Dov Seidman: If I sell more books and my publisher thinks there’s a winner there.

Tom Friedman: That is, you know, we hear all about China. Where China’s going to steamroll us. We’re road kill to China. China. Britain owned the 19th century. America owned the 20th century. China will own the 21st century. How are they on how as you look at it?

Dov Seidman: I think that our advantage, if we want to stay ahead, we’re not going to become hungrier than they. I mean hungry as a complimentary term. Their sense of hunger, to make a mark, to drive forward in their lives and in business seems to be, they have a voracious appetite, as do people in India and other countries.

High ground for us is imagination, ideas, innovation. And I think that we can always keep that high ground if we go on TRIPs, if we go Trust, Risk, Innovation to Progress.

But why not turn that to our advantage? If we start with the idea and add value at the back end of the idea: how to bring it to market, how to connect it to consumers, which we’re also great at. They might own a lot of the middle but I would advise us to make sure that we come in the front and come out the back and collaborate and partner in what happens in between.

Tom Friedman: So just on last question. If I’m a candidate for President and I really buy into this that the one way we can always stay ahead is by producing, always being that more innovative country. And that’s not an easy thing to adopt or he can’t have one hour of innovation class in Singapore and think it’s going to bring about innovation, you know.

You want to produce that trust that will produce that risk taking that will stimulate that innovation that will drive progress and profits. As a President, what can the President do legislatively, bully pulpit-wise so that our next President ? because we’re coming off a period of real division here in this country, most divisive eight years I certainly remember ? so we were still inventing iPods and CAT scans and whatnot, but we want to maximize that. You’re the advisor to the next President. What do you tell them?

Dov Seidman: Tom, every generation feels and announces that its values are the best. What the lens of how allows us to do is if we live and act our values, we know what your values are based on what you’re doing.

So, if you run around the world using the word crusade, I can’t embrace your values. What I’m hoping is that looking at life through the lens of HOW we do what we do, we will take the values that we hold dear, freedom, equality, justice, fairness, our Constitutional values, and put the pressure on us to say if we believe this, we’re  going to act this way because…

Tom Friedman: Make sure there’s no gap between.

Dov Seidman: No gap. To believe this is not to do this and it’s to do that. And that how we do what we do tells us. Anybody can pop off and say my values are the best. Countries do that and presidents do that and we do that in different time frames. But if your values are so good, then show them to me through how you do what you do.
[Applause]


Thomas L. Friedman, a world-renowned author and journalist, joined The New York Times in 1981 as a financial reporter specializing in OPEC- and oil-related news and later served as the chief diplomatic, chief White House, and international economics correspondents. A three-time Pulitzer Prize winner, he has traveled hundreds of thousands of miles reporting the Middle East conflict, the end of the cold war, U.S. domestic politics and foreign policy, international economics, and the worldwide impact of the terrorist threat. His foreign affairs column, which appears twice a week in the Times, is syndicated to seven hundred other newspapers worldwide.

Friedman is the author of From Beirut to Jerusalem (FSG, 1989), which won both the National Book Award and the Overseas Press Club Award in 1989 and was on the New York Times bestseller list for nearly twelve months. From Beirut to Jerusalem has been published in more than twenty-seven languages, including Chinese and Japanese, and is now used as a basic textbook on the Middle East in many high schools and universities. Friedman also wrote The Lexus and the Olive Tree (FSG, 1999), one of the best selling business books in 1999, and the winner of the 2000 Overseas Press Club Award for best nonfiction book on foreign policy. It is now available in twenty languages. His last book, Longitudes and Attitudes: Exploring the World After September 11, issued by FSG in 2002, consists of columns Friedman published about September 11 as well as a diary of his private experiences and reflections during his reporting on the post-September world as he traveled from Afghanistan to Israel to Europe to Indonesia to Saudi Arabia. In 2005, The World Is Flat was given the first Financial Times and Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year Award, and Friedman was named one of America's Best Leaders by U.S. News & World Report.

Friedman graduated summa cum laude from Brandeis University with a degree in Mediterranean studies and received a master's degree in modern Middle East studies from Oxford. He has served as a visiting professor at Harvard University and has been awarded honorary degrees from several U.S. universities. He lives in Bethesda, Maryland, with his wife, Ann, and their two daughters.
Dov Seidman is CEO of LRN and author of HOW: Why HOW We Do Anything Means Everything in Business (and in Life). 

Thirteen years ago, Seidman had a vision of a new kind of company that would help businesses get their hows right. With this powerful vision and an over-extended credit card, he founded LRN in the living room of his apartment.

Today, Seidman has grown LRN into a highly successful company of over 200 employees, whose clients include some of the world’s most respected companies ? Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Trump Entertainment, The New York Times Company, Raytheon, and more than 250 others. Through its legal research group and its ethics and compliance education solutions and applications, LRN helps companies shape their corporate cultures and build strong, principled organizations that win in the marketplace.

In 2004, Seidman testified before the United States Sentencing Commission about the need for companies to focus on fostering ethical cultures instead of simply developing check-the-box, formulaic approaches to complying with the law. Today, companies are judged by this higher standard, and consumers, investors and employees are placing greater expectations on companies to operate legally and ethically ? in effect, to get their hows right.

Seidman holds degrees in philosophy from UCLA, politics and economics from Oxford, and law from Harvard Law School. He is recognized for his thought leadership on a wide range of issues, and is frequently invited to speak at leading industry events and to senior management and Boards of Directors. Recent presentations about the importance of being both profitable and principled include the Outstanding Directors Exchange, The Defense Industry Initiative’s Best Practices Forum, National Contract Management Association World Congress, Council of State Governments, and Corporate Board Member Magazine Boardroom Summit. He has also been a keynote speaker at UCLA’s annual commencement.

Seidman’s views on business behavior, success and corporate culture have been quoted in dozens of print and broadcast media, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes, The Financial Times, CNBC, ABC’s Good Morning America and BBC News. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Thomas L. Friedman included excerpts from his interviews with Seidman on the importance of trust and protecting and strengthening corporate reputations in his best-selling book,

The World is Flat.

크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
웹2.0 기술 이용 `이러닝 2.0' 성공 예감

사용자 참여, 공유, 사회적 네트워킹 등을 특성으로 하는 웹2.0이 각광받고 있는 가운데
웹2.0 기술을 이용한 전자학습 기술인 `이러닝 2.0'이 주목받고 있다.

   6일 미국의 IT관련 온라인 뉴스매체인
리드라이트웹(http://www.readwriteweb.com) 등에 따르면
교사와 학생 모두 블로그나 팟캐스팅(Podcasting) 등에 익숙해지면서
블로그와 위키피디아 등
사회적 네트워크형 소프트웨어들을 엮어
기존의 이러닝보다 자연스런 교육환경을 만들고 있다.

  
쌍방향성을 중시하는 이러닝 2.0사이트의 대표적인 예로는
블로그를 기본 플랫폼으로 활용한
에듀블로그(http://www.edublogs.org/)
위키를 기반으로 한 위키스페이스(http://www.wikispaces.com/) 등을 꼽을 수 있다.

   또한 교사와 학생이 함께 적는 공동 노트를 표방하는
스터디셔스(http://www.stu.dicio.us/)와
손쉽게 신문이나 팜플렛을 만들 수 있도록 하는
리드라이트씽크 프린팅 프레스
(ReadWriteThink Printing Press, http://www.readwritethink.org/) 등도 등장했다.

   특히 사회적 네트워킹 기능이 강조된
엘그(Elgg, http://www.elgg.org/)는 웹 2.0과 이러닝이 절묘하게 결합한 좋은 예이다.
사용자들에게
각자 블로그와 파일 저장소,
온라인 프로필과 RSS 리더를 배당하고
태깅 기능도 첨부해 모든 콘텐츠에는 키워드를 붙일 수 있다.

   어학 이러닝 2.0 사이트는
차이니즈팟(ChinesePod, http://www.chinesepod.com/)이 대표적이다.
차이니즈팟은
표준 중국어를 학습하는 사이트로, 팟케스팅, RSS, 블로그 등을 이용하고 있다.

   기존의 어학 학습이 단순히 책을 읽거나 CD를 통해 배우는 정도였다면
차이니즈팟에서는 특정 상황을 선택해 토론에 참가하는 쌍방향 학습이 가능하고
팟케스팅과 대본을 통해
멀티미디어 학습의 효과를 한껏 누릴 수 있다.

   이 사이트에서 제공하는 게시판과 위키, 블로그, 사진첩, RSS 등
커뮤니티 기능(http://www.chinesepod.com/)은
어학 학습의 동기를 부여하고 흥미를 유발시킨다
구글도 교육용
무료 구글 응용팩(http://www.google.com/a/edu/)을 제공하면서
이러닝 2.0에 눈독을 들이고 있다.
구글은 G메일, 채팅, 일정 관리, 페이지 생성기, 시작 화면 등을 묶어 교육용 팩으로 구성했다.

   또 `교육자를 위한 구글
(Google for educators, http://www.google.com/educators/index.html )이라는
이름으로 교육용 자료 플랫폼도 개발했다.

   애플 역시 무료로 팟케스팅 호스팅 서비스(http://www.apple.com/education/solutions/itunes_u/ )를
교육 목적을 위해 제공하고 있으며
이외에 마이크로소프트(MS), IBM 등 그외 대기업들도 이러닝 2.0에 관심을 보이고 있다.

(서울=연합뉴스) 류현성 기자
크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
메일을 동시에 여러 동료 혹은 학생들에게 보낼 일이 있습니다.
한메일, 파란메일 등 대부분의 메일 서비스에서 '동시에 메일 보내기' 가 가능합니다.

메일을 보낸 사람 입장에서는 경우에 따라
상대방이 내가 보낸 메일을 보았는 지가 상당히 궁금할 경우가 있습니다.
상대방이 메일을 열람하면 자동으로 언제 보았는 지 알려주기는 하지만
그래도 조바심이 날 때가 있습니다.

보낸 메일을 게시판에 자동으로 올려놓으면 어떨까요?
팀원(교사와 학생)으로 함께 하는 그룹만이 이용할 수 있도록
게시판이 함께 제공된다면 어떨까요?


보낸 메일을 자동으로 팀원만이 공유할 수 있는 게시판에 자동으로 업로드해줍니다.
게시판에 올려줄 뿐만 아니라,
팀원 개개인에게 메일도 동시에 보내줍니다.
혹시
메일이 인터넷 등의 사정으로 배달되지 않더라도
팀원은 게시판에 들어와서 메일 내용을 확인할 수 있습니다.
그리고
댓글을 다는 기능도 있어서, 상호 커뮤니케이션이 되기도 합니다.

대용량의 파일을 보낸다?
파일의 용량에 관계없이 보낼 수 있습니다.
굳이 웹하드를 따로 이용하지 않더라도, 파일 공유가 가능합니다.

이 모든 것이 파란닷컴의 팀메일 서비스가 무료로 제공합니다.
작은 그룹(교사와 학생)에서의 작은 인트라넷 개념으로 활용하면 Good 입니다.

http://team.paran.com/ 



spidergram을 통해
화일을 공유하고 싶을 때,
적극 권장합니다.      -- 진너자하


 
 





크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
Web2.0 그 다음은? [조인스]
네티즌과 함께 하는 `웹 2.0 인사이드`시리즈 ⑦
J-Only
"장마철 물난리 나기 가장 쉬운 곳은?"

네이버 지식IN에 이 질문을 던지면 99건의 검색결과가 나온다.
하지만 검색된 자료 중 원하는 대답은 없다.
사용자는 '어느 지역에 작년 물난리가 났었는지'를 찾거나
물난리 관련 뉴스를 검색해 수많은 정보를 바탕으로 스스로 답을 찾아야 한다.

네이버 지식IN은 사용자의 '집단지성'이 '지능형 웹'으로 진화되기 전의 모형이다.
이처럼
현재의 웹은 사용자가 마우스나 키보드를 이용해
원하는 정보를 찾아 눈으로 보고 이해하는 형식.
웹 기술은 여기서 만족하지 않고
컴퓨터가 직접 질문과 자료를 이해하고 명확한 답을 낼 수 있는
시멘틱웹(Semantic Web)으로 진화하고 있다.

시멘틱웹이란
컴퓨터가 정보자원의 뜻을 이해하고,
논리적 추론까지 할 수 있는 지능형 기술을 뜻한다.

미국에서는 1999년 시멘틱웹 개념이 도입돼 정보기관인 CIA등에서부터 해당 연구가 진행됐다.
뉴욕타임스는 지난해 11월 12일 시멘틱웹 기반의 웹3.0시대를 소개했다.
올 3월 12일에는 미국 메사추세츠공대(MIT)에서 발행하는
테크놀로지리뷰(Technology Review)도
웹3.0이 온다고 예고하는 등 미국의 정부, 기업, 대학 등에서 웹3.0 연구가 활발하다.

"두 초등학생 자녀를 둔 30대 후반의 맞벌이 부부입니다.
올 7월 주말계획으로 사람들 별로 없는 휴양지를 찾는데요.
2박3일에 50만원 정도 쓰면서 재밌게 쉬다 올 수 있는 곳 없을까요?

Web3.0에서는 이런 질문을 한 번에 해결할 수 있다.
마치 여행사에서 상담을 받듯 사용자가 웹에서 적합한 여행상품을 안내받을 수 있다는 것.




나만의 웹=웹3.0은 모든 서비스의 중심이 개인이 되는 시대다.
날카로운 상상력 연구소 김용섭 소장은

"웹 기술이 개인화를 구현하게 되면서
'오직 당신'만을 위한 콘텐트와 서비스가 확대될 것"이라며
"즉 '참여'가 웹2.0의 화두였다면 웹3.0의 핵심어는 '개인화'"라고 말했다.

코리아인터넷닷컴 예병일 대표이사는
"참여 공유 개방의 웹2.0 특징이 더욱 강화되면서
'참여하는 인간'과 '똑똑한 웹'이 의사소통하는 모습을 보게 될 것"이라고 전망했다.




경계가 사라진다=
전문가들은 웹3.0시대엔 웹서버, 데스크톱PC, 모바일의 경계가 무너질 것으로 내다보고 있다.
KT 경영연구소 미래사회연구센터 김영수 책임연구원은
"모든 매체 간 경계가 사라지는 네트워크의 강화,
즉 현실적인 유비쿼터스가 구현될 것"이라고 설명했다.

이에 따라 현재 높은 수익을 내고 있는 대형포털에 대한 경고도 나온다.
서울대 사회학과 장덕진 교수는
"기존 시장을 선점한 주요 포털들이
네트워크 수평화에 대한 대안을 못 내놓은 상태에서 소모적인 팽창이 이뤄지고 있다"며
"검색과 네트워킹 기능이 데스크톱 차원으로 내려오게 되면
포털 사이트라는 것 자체가 필요 없어지는 상황이 올 수 있다"고 지적했다.

인간을 위한 웹3.0이 돼야=
이트너스 웹기획부문 이정기씨는
"'웹2.0의 미래'라는 단순한 하나의 방향으로만 가는 게 아니라
'인간 중심적 접근'이라는 과제를 잊지 않는 웹의 진보가 돼야할 것"이라고 말했다.
이에 대해 중앙대 신문방송학과 이재신 교수는
"'인간적'이라는 건 기술이라고 생각되지 않을 정도로 자연스러운 기술"이라며
"가위는 꼭 필요한 기술이지만
사람들이 그것을 특별하다고 생각하지 않듯,
자연스러운 사이버 공간이 바람직한 웹3.0이 될 것"
이라고 내다봤다.

최선욱 기자 isotope@joongang.co.kr
---------------------------------------------------------------------

교육에 있어서
웹2.0과 웹3.0의 도입은 무엇을 뜻하는 것이 될까?

학교라는 공간이 그대로 존속한다? 아니다?
가르치는 교사가 필요하다? 아니다?
학교에 간다? 안간다?

지금도 사람들이 떼지어 살고 있는 마을을 내려다 본다.
각자는 무엇인지는 모르나
아주 열심히 도시생활을 한다.
어느 땐가.....
뉴욕의 중심가가 슬럼화된다는 이야기를 들었다.

한국의 수도 서울은 어떨까?
화폐라는 상품을 얻기 위해, 오늘도 버스는 달린다.....진너자하
크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
와이프로거=주부(wife)와 블로거(blogger)의 합성어.
블로그에 살림 관련 콘텐트를 올리는 주부들을 가리키는 신조어다.

    Club CapeTown : 멀리 떨어져 있는 Choa를 위해 올립니다.

결혼 11년차인 쌍둥이 형제(5) 엄마 문성실(32.사진)씨와
취재 약속을 잡는 일은 인기 연예인만큼 어려웠다.
방송 출연 등 스케줄이 워낙 빡빡했기 때문이다.
17일 오후, 그는 만나자마자 강연 일정 등이 빼곡히 적힌 수첩을 보여줬다.

문씨는 요리법을 올린 인터넷 블로그로 스타급 반열에 오른,
일명 '와이프로거(wifelogger)'다.
블로그 개설 4년 만에 누적 방문객 수가 800만 명에 이르고,
새 요리법을 올리면 3만 명이 접속한다.
요리책도 네 권이나 출간했다.
쌍둥이를 키우며 해 먹는 일상적인 요리법에
"따라하기 쉽다"며 주부들의 방문이 폭증하는 것이다.
올해 초 삼각김밥 만드는 법을 올리자 인터넷 쇼핑몰의 김밥 틀이 동났을 정도다.
그러니 식품.생활가전 회사들이 그와 공동마케팅을 벌이기 위해 혈안이다.
그는 "연간 수입이 남편 연봉의 세 배쯤 된다"고 말했다.

와이프로거가 뜨고 있다.
특히 스타급은 '주부 군단' 팬을 거느리며 막강한 입소문의 진원지로 등장했다.
한국판 마사 스튜어트를 꿈꾼다
인테리어 DIY(Do It Yourself) 카페 '레몬테라스'를 운영하는 황혜경(34)씨는
3년 전
블로그로 시작해
이젠 회원 40만 명, 하루 방문자 수가 5만 명이 넘는 인기 홈페이지 주인이 됐다.

황씨는 "건축 부자재 업체에서 각종 사업 제안이 하루에 대여섯 건씩 들어온다"고 말했다.
살림 솜씨 하나로
음식.인테리어.조경 사업에서 막대한 부를 일군
미국 '살림의 여왕' 마사 스튜어트가 연상될 정도다.

현재 블로그를 운영하는 주부는 28만여 명.
이 중 한 내용에 1만여 건의 조회 수를 올리는
인기 블로그는 50여 개로 인터넷 업계는 추정한다.
인기 블로그에는 사진과 함께 살림 노하우를 알려주는 콘텐트가 거의 매일 새로 올라온다.
문성실씨는 "하루 5~6시간을 새 콘텐트 올리는 데 쓴다"고 말했다.

사용자 삽입 이미지

와이프로거를 잡아라
식품.인테리어.가전 업체들이 와이프로거 마케팅에 적극적이다.
미니오븐 업체인 컨벡스코리아는
지난해 문성실씨와 함께 미니오븐 활용 요리법 책을 냈고,
최근엔 10명의 인기 블로거에게 새 제품을 무료로 제공했다.
이 회사 관계자는
"주부들이 오븐 요리를 시작할 때 주로 블로그의 요리법을 따라 한다"고 말했다.

믹서기.소형오븐 등을 파는 필립스는
4월 주방가전 온라인 커뮤니티
'필립스 키친(cafe.naver.com/philipskitchen)' 을 개설하면서
유명 와이프로거 6명을 채용해 정기적으로 요리법을 올리도록 했다.
이 카페는 문을 열기도 전에
2000여 명이 회원 신청 대기자에 이름을 올렸고,
개설 3개월 만에 카페 회원이 5000명을 넘어섰다.

글=임미진 기자, 사진=김태성 기자

-------------------------------------------------
블로그란?

1. 가족간의 대화를 만들어내는데 최적의 도구입니다.
   내가 쓴 글과 모은 글이 10년도 넘게 저장되고 기억될 것입니다.
2. 만들기 어렵고, 쓰기 귀찮다.
   아니요,,, 원하시면 대한민국을 위해 만들어 드립니다.
   설치형 블로그가 결국은 흐름입니다.
3. 시작은 미약하였으나, 나중은 창대하리라하는 그 말씀이
   블로그에 딱 맞는 그런 것입니다.
4. 정성을 가지고, 쓰여진 글은 사람의 마음을 울리고, 감동을 줍니다.

Club CapeTown!!

 그 시작이 아직은 서툴지만 벌써 3,000여명이 관심을 가지고 있습니다.  진너자하
크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
사용자 삽입 이미지

정보는 묻혀있는 것 보다는
널리 공유될 수 있어야 한다고 믿습니다.

그 공유 가치 실현을 블로그라는 놈이 좀 더 쉽게 만들어주고 있습니다.

공유, 개방, 그리고 참여
참여, 그리고 공유, 개방
................................

블로그를 운영하면서, 리퍼러 로그를 자주 살펴보곤 합니다.
내가 올리고 있는 글들이 어떻게 세상의 관심을 받고 있는 지 궁금하기 때문입니다.

몇일전부터 새로운 리퍼러를 통해 내 블로그를 찾는 이들이 많아집니다.



사용자 삽입 이미지
http://www.brainn.co.kr/news.jsp

따라가봤습니다.

[리퍼러 로그의 일부분을 캡쳐했습니다] by 스내그잇(snagit 소프트웨어)
사용자 삽입 이미지

brainn 의 첫화면입니다. (그림을 클릭하면, 제대로 보입니다)
사용자 삽입 이미지

사용자 삽입 이미지

[머리로 기억하는 교육은 1달러의 가치도 없다]
24명의 브레인이 이 글을 추천해주고 있습니다.

========================================================================

브레인앤에 대한 자세한 사용방법은 생략하도록 하겠습니다.

관련기사 보기 : ZDNet Korea

모든 블로그는 피드 주소를 가지고 있습니다.
위젯 등 여러 도구를 통해, 개인화 페이지를 만들기 쉬워집니다.

수천만 혹은 수십억개의 블로그를 통해
새로운 정보가 쏟아져 나오고 있습니다.

내 입맛에 맞는 정보를 책갈피(북마크)해야 할 필요성 이 나옵니다.

한 발 더 나아가
누군가에 의해서 평가받은 양질의 컨텐츠만을 볼 수 있기를 바랍니다.

브레인앤의 가치는
평가받은 컨텐츠를 볼 수 있는 것에 있지 않을까 합니다.

정보를 공개하는 이유는
정보가 재생산되는 순기능을 믿기 때문입니다.

단순히 블로그의 방문자를 늘리기 위한 도구로 전락하지 않기를 희망합니다.

누구나 소중한 정보를 가지고 있습니다.
정보의 흐름이 가치있게 평가받는 이쁜 세상을 기대합니다.

[블로그 따라하기(1)] 오늘은 갑자기 방문자가 두배로 올라갔다. 왜?
[블로그 따라하기(2)] 포스트 부분 비밀글 만들기 by ♡차칸아이♡
[블로그 따라하기(3)] 블로그는 어디서 만드나요? - 블로그 서비스 사이트 모음
[블러그 따라하기(4)] 블로그 홍보하기 : 블로그 위의 블로그 메타블로그(메타사이트) 
[블로그 따라하기(5)] 이올린(eolin.com) 첫화면 최상단에 3개의 최근추천글이 떴습니다.
[블로그 따라하기(6)] 동영상 UCC 업로드 후, 플레이어 스킨의 크기 및 화질 비교 (1)
[블로그 따라하기(7)] 평가받은 컨텐츠만을 접해도 하루가 부족합니다.

크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA
사용자 삽입 이미지
[실험 동기]
유클래스 영상학습 연구소
영상학습에 필요한
다양한 소프트웨어와 하드웨어의 활용에 대해
연구하고 있습니다.

멀티미디어 디지털텍스트와 같은
디지털데이터를 활용하여
빔프로젝터,PDP 등
대형 출력장치로 쏘아주는 것만으로도
영상학습은 시작입니다.

여기에 하나 더
이러한 디지털데이터를 기반으로 진행된
학습의 모든 과정을
실시간으로 녹화하고
녹화한 동영상을
학생들이 다시 볼 수 있는 환경을
구축하고 있습니다.

동일한 교사가

동일한 내용을

가장 빠른 시간내에

다시 또 반복해서 설명해준다면

배운 내용을 장기기억상태로 변화시키는데 가장 좋은 모델이고,
결과로
모든 학생이 훌륭한 인재로 성장할 것을 믿기 때문입니다.

그 방법을 연구하고 전달하고자 합니다.

[실험 조건]
PC의 모니터에서 구현된 내용을
캠타시아 녹화소프트웨어를 사용하여
스크린 캡쳐한 avi 파일을
각각의 동영상 UCC 사이트에 업로드를 하고, 화질을 비교한 것입니다.


* 디지털캠코더와 같은 영상장비를 이용해 찍은
동영상 파일을 대상으로 한 비교가 아님을  이해하시고,
아래의 비교를 보셔야 합니다.


[1] 원본파일 : 약 17.68M 크기의 avi 파일
      캠타시아로 녹화한 파일을 캠타시아 스튜디오에서 콜아웃 등의 기능을 넣고 편집한 후
      다시 avi 파일로 저장하면서, 사이즈를 800x600 으로 변환하였음.



 (avi 파일이기 때문에, 다운로드가 모두 진행된 후 플레이어가 자동으로 켜집니다.
  포스트내에서 실행되면, 포스트가 가로 580픽셀만 지원되므로, 오른쪽 부분이 안보입니다.
  마우스로 화면을 더블클릭하면, 원본 크기로 재생됩니다.
  화질비교를 위한 것이므로, 참고하시기만 하십시오. )

[2] 태그스토리(www.tagstory.com) 에 업로드

  - 태그스토리에 업로드를 하면, 서버에서 flv 파일로 변환합니다.
  - 변환된 flv 파일의 사이즈는 2.87M 로 원본 17.68M 대비 약 84%가 줄었습니다.

  - 퍼올때, 플레이어의 기본 크기는 400x300 입니다.
  - 200%로 확대(800x600)해서 보면, 원본이 많이 손상된 것을 확인할 수 있습니다.




[3] 엠군(www.mgoon.com) 에 업로드

  - 엠군에 업로드를 하면, 서버에서 flv 파일로 변환합니다.
  - 변환된 flv 파일의 사이즈는 12.62M 로 원본 17.68M 대비 약 29%가 줄었습니다.

  - 퍼올때, 플레이어의 기본 크기는 500x375 입니다.

사용자 삽입 이미지



  - 엠군 플레이어 바의 오른쪽 맨 끝 아이콘을 누르면 '전체화면' 보기로 전환됩니다.
  - '전체화면' 상태에서 다시 바로 옆의 아이콘을 누르면 '원본크기' 보기로 전환됩니다.

    업로드하기 위한 원본 파일 대비 약 70% 정도의 화질을 유지해주기 때문에
    중간중간 약간의 흔들림이 있기는 하지만,
    800x600의 원본 사이즈로 보시기에 크게 불편하지 않네요.






[4] 판도라TV(www.pandora.tv) 에 업로드

  - 판도라TV에 업로드를 하면, 서버에서 flv 파일로 변환합니다.
  - 변환된 flv 파일의 사이즈는 7.35M 로 원본 17.68M 대비 약 58%가 줄었습니다.

  - 퍼올때, 플레이어의 기본 크기는 440x330 입니다.
    태그스토리는 변환된 사이즈가 실제로 400x300이고, 퍼올 때 스킨의 크기도 동일합니다.
    판도라TV의 실제 변환된 사이즈는 320x240입니다. 시각적으로 크기를 강조하기 위해
    플레이어의 크기를 확장시켜놓은 것입니다.
    리사이즈한 파일크기로만 보면, 엠군 보다는 못하더라도 태그스토리보다는
    좋은 화질이어야 하는데... 이는 동일한 확장자(flv) 이더라도 변환 방식의 차이 때문에
    파일크기는 크지만 화질이 좋지 않을 수 있습니다.


  - 전체화면으로 보면, 원본이 많이 손상된 것을 확인할 수 있습니다.





[5] 종합 비교

1) 리사이징(resizing) 비교 : 원본크기 17.68M / 800x600
   - 태그스토리 : 2.87M / 400x300
   - 엠군 : 12.62M / 800x600 (원본크기 유지)
   - 판도라TV : 7.35M / 320x240


2) 결론
   - 디지털캠코더와 같은 영상장비를 이용하여 촬영한 동영상은
     리사이징한 화면의 크기가 320x240이든, 400x300이든
     이것을 조금 늘려서 플레이어 스킨을 꾸미든
     시각적으로 크게 차이가 나지 않을 수 있습니다.

   - 하지만, PC 모니터의 화면을 캡쳐하여 저장한 동영상은
     리사이징해서 줄여놓고, 다시 늘려 보면 화질이 좋지 않을 수 있습니다.

   - 따라서, 원본의 사이즈와 화질을 최대로 유지시켜주는 엠군의 서비스가
     PC 모니터의 스크린을 녹화한 동영상을 업로드하기에 가장 좋은 것 같습니다.

*** 400x300 사이즈의 동영상을 보는 데 들어가는 네트웍(인터넷회선 등) 비용과
     800x600 사이즈의 동영상을 보는 데 들어가는 네트웍 비용은 몇 배 차이가 날까요?

     언뜻 생각하면 2배라 생각되지만, 답은 4배입니다.

     태그스토리, 엠군, 판도라TV 등 모든 서비스업체가
     더 큰 화면과 더 좋은 화질로 경쟁을 하더라도
     엄청난 비용의 증가를 감당할만한 여유가 아직 없는 듯 합니다.

     그래서
     과감하게 새로운 시장에 한 발 앞선 엠군이 돋보이는 지 모르겠습니다.

     각각의 서비스마다 시작의 동기가 틀리고 활용이 틀립니다.
     UCC 동영상의 종류와 활용방법에 따라 적절한 서비스를 이용하시는 것이 좋습니다.

     주관적인 생각이 있을 수 있거나, 혹은 기술적으로 미약한 논리 전개가 있을 수 있습니다.
     댓글로 알려주시기 바랍니다.


[블로그 따라하기(1)] 오늘은 갑자기 방문자가 두배로 올라갔다. 왜?
[블로그 따라하기(2)] 포스트 부분 비밀글 만들기 by ♡차칸아이♡
[블로그 따라하기(3)] 블로그는 어디서 만드나요? - 블로그 서비스 사이트 모음
[블러그 따라하기(4)] 블로그 홍보하기 : 블로그 위의 블로그 메타블로그(메타사이트) 
[블로그 따라하기(5)] 이올린(eolin.com) 첫화면 최상단에 3개의 최근추천글이 떴습니다.
[블로그 따라하기(6)] 동영상 UCC 업로드 후, 플레이어 스킨의 크기 및 화질 비교 (1)
[블로그 따라하기(7)] 평가받은 컨텐츠만을 접해도 하루가 부족합니다.

크리에이티브 커먼즈 라이선스
Creative Commons License
Posted by SELVA